The Herald makes another of its rare excursions into the world of beer...
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/health/news/article.cfm?c_id=204&obje...
In a damning report on strong beers being sold in supermarkets the writer highlights the "problem" saying, "The strongest - 12 per cent Gordon Finest Platinum - has the same alcohol content as many wines."
Shock horror!!!
The implication here is that while it's perfectly normal for wine to be 12 percent or more, it is not acceptable for a beer to be that strength. Why?
In Blenheim - and, I suspect, elsewhere - supermarkets routinely offer budget wines for $7 a 750ml bottle, or less. That works out at $9.33 for a litre containing 12 plus percent alcohol.
According to the Regional Wines website the Dutch brew Pirate retails at $4.75 for a 500ml bottle. That's $9.50 per litre containing 8.5 percent alcohol.
Which drink then should be being singled out for criticism for offering the biggest (potentially most harmful) bang for the buck?
Answers please to The Herald.