Hahaha neither am I Melanoidin is spot on for weight of malt but the Rye added? Who knows its a real mishmash of a beer it will be intresting to see what the first runnings taste like, more so mid runnings If there dry i might be right if there sweet sweet im goosed!!
Nah no chance up there that brewery is very very well thought out and works, mine how ever is beaten up and thrown together, and nothing is starting to work!!!
Permalink Reply by MrC on April 24, 2010 at 10:45pm
Although it's on the low side at 5.05, I wouldn't worry about it.
Looking at your grain bill and knowing the Wellington water profile I'm surprised that the PH got that low. You'll probably just get a really clear beer ;-) The only risk is a little astringency but at 5.05 I think you'll be OK.
yeah, as long as it's over 5 you'll be fine. even slightly under 5 doesn't seem to matter too much for flavour but your efficiency, if you care about that, might suffer slightly. in any case, i think a ph too low is much better than too high: at ph greater than 6 you start extracting a lot of tannins from the husk...
well, brew is working nicely.colour came out a nice deep brown, 19.5L of 1.070 goodness in fermenter.
boil was a PITA though. not getting enough temp out of the burner for some reason. i brewed saturday evening, and it really wasn't that cold.
when i stuck in the IC, i got no more boil (maybe this was too cold?), and the temp sat at 96/97 for ages, before i gave up, called it a boil and turned the cold water on (which only took 25 mins to get to pitch temp, instead of hte usual 60).
that was the only thing wrong with brew day (or evening in this case).