Want to place an ad email luke@realbeer.co.nz
$50+GST / month
Tags:
"Big Exit" Saison Barleywine
42% Pilsner
35% Pale Ale Malt
15% Wheat
7% Caramunich 2
1% Cararoma
Sauvin / Motueka 1:3 part blend @ 60, 30 and 15min
1.086, 58ibu
Wyeast 3711 French Saison, second gen (did a Return to Megenta remix with the first gen)... @ 22c and rising
2 mashes... my first time ever, and it was a long day but suited looking after kids here and there. Second mash used the Pilsner and a bit more wheat, it was a bitch to get running clear so I ended up flagging it. The first was a beautiful.
First brew of the year, a play on my favourite pale ale.
Simcarillo Pale Ale II
4.90 kg Global Cologne
0.29 kg Carafa II Special
0.25 kg Global Light Caramel
0.20 kg Cara Malt
0.08 kg Black Malt
20.00 gm Centennial [9.20 %] (60 min) 23.4 IBU
15.00 gm Simcoe [12.20 %] (15 min) 11.5 IBU
15.00 gm Amarillo [7.50 %] (15 min) 7.1 IBU
15.00 gm Amarillo [7.50 %] (10 min) 5.2 IBU
15.00 gm Simcoe [12.20 %] (10 min) 8.4 IBU
20.00 gm Simcoe [12.20 %] (0 min)
20.00 gm Amarillo [7.50 %] (0 min)
25.00 gm Simcoe [12.20 %] (Dry Hop 7 days)
S05
OG of 1.056
55 IBU
Hey Nat,
still using Gladfield's a lot? How do you find it? Particularly in comparison to other pale/pilsner malts?
Reason I ask, is I find it (in comparison) a bit 'flat' and lacking in character. I don't know if it's because it's fresher and perhaps has a slightly higher moisture content, or I am tending that it is simply the character of the malt.
I prefer Weyermann's or MO, for my lagers or PA's. Is it an availability or cost factor for you?
I'm interested in your thoughts?
Jumping on the low gravity bandwagon today to grow up some yeast for a brown ale.
Little Red
1.040, mash at 69C
Gladfield Ale Malt |
3.338 kg |
79.9 % |
|
|
Medium Crystal |
0.250 kg |
6.0 % |
|
|
CaraRed |
0.209 kg |
5.0 % |
|
|
CaraPils |
0.208 kg |
5.0 % |
|
|
CaraAroma |
0.130 kg |
3.1 % |
|
|
Chocolate Malt |
0.042 kg |
1.0 % |
|
|
Willamette 45 g @ 60
Willamette 32 g @ turn off
Willamette 50 g Dry-Hopped
Amarillo 24 g Dry-Hopped
Wyeast 1882-Thames Valley Ale II
Gearing up for the first homebrew of the year:
Bourgogne des Marlborough:
40% Vienna
40% Gladfield Ale
6.7% Caramunich
6.7% CaraHell
3.3% CaraAroma
3.3% Pale Crystal
17 IBU of what ever low alpha hop I can find, Hallertau Aroma perhaps.
Mashing at 70C to get a bunch of unfermentables for the bugs to chew on.
Still contemplating the fermentation but at the moment I plan to:
Pitch a small amount of 1272 and ferment for a couple of days, rack of the trub and dead yeast and add my cocktail of bugs: 2 types of brett, lactobacillus and pediococcus. Stick it in a dark place for a year and see what happens...
The alternative is to add both the yeast and the bugs from the beginning.
Thoughts?
what, no hops at all??
interesting take on pitching the lacto from the beginning and the rest of the bugs later. exactly the kind of advise
i was hoping to find as I've never made a true sour before.
does the lacto need the nutrients before the yeast eats it all or is it your preference to have it really lactic?
BUT, the brewday has been postponed: my fermenters was not cleaned properly before xmas and have grown some funky bright red fungus. one might say that would be perfect for a flanders red but i'm not that brave.... letting them soak in caustic for a few days.
Anything over about 5 ibu will inhibit lacto.
Lacto is a bit of a slow worker so it needs a head starts to get some fermentables.
In saying that though, you don't need to worry about lacto, you'll get pretty much all your acidity from the pedio. Most lambic and Flander's producer wanted to reduce the amount of acidity they got from lacto, hence the Flander's being around 10 - 20 IBU and the use of aged hops in Lambics - which will still inhibit lacto.
If you want it really sour (like Rodenbach Grand Cru) pitch everything in the beginning, give it a couple weeks to work it's magic, then secondary for as long as you can stand it. For something less sour (Duchess or Rodenbach Klassic) ferment with your ale strain first then pitch all the bugs into secondary.
great info! do you think I could get away with no lacto at all? just went trhough my yeast supply and realize I freaking forgot to order it! still have the other bugs though.
I want it really sour, grand cru sour at least. so i suppose I do need the lacto?
From what I've read I'd say 'no' but then Wyeast and WL both include lacto in their lambic or Roaselare blends. So that's up to you mate :-)
Not really, if you shoot for about 10-20 IBU, that lacto isn't really gonna do much, pretty much all the sourness in lambics and Flanders comes from pedio.
http://www2.parc.com/emdl/members/apte/flemishredale.shtml is an awesome resource. Wild Brews is great too if you can get your hands on a copy.
© 2024 Created by nzbrewer. Powered by